Square and delta reflection
The \(\Delta\)-reflection principle is a strong reflection principle introduced by \textit{M. Magidor} and \textit{S. Shelah} [J. Am. Math. Soc. 7, No. 4, 769--830 (1994; Zbl 0819.20059)]. It implies various interesting structural properties, in particular, the stationary reflection principle. It is known that assuming the existence of infinitely many supercompact cardinals, it is consistent that \(\aleph_{\omega^2+1}\) is the smallest regular cardinal that can have the \(\Delta\)-reflection.NEWLINENEWLINEThe principle \(\square(\kappa)\) is a variant of Jensen's square introduced by \textit{S. Todorcevic} [Acta Math. 159, 261--294 (1987; Zbl 0658.03028)]. It is a typical anti-reflection principle. Although the \(\Delta\)-reflection implies the failure of the weak square \(\square^*_\kappa\), a weaker version of \(\square_\kappa\), in this article, under the assumption of infinitely many supercompact cardinals, the authors constructed a model in which the \(\Delta\)-reflection principle holds at \(\aleph_{\omega^2+1}\) together with the square principle \(\square_{\omega^2+1}\).
- A compactness theorem for singular cardinals, free algebras, Whitehead problem and transversals
- Chain conditions of products, and weakly compact cardinals
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3496166 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3503245 (Why is no real title available?)
- Jensen's ⃞ principles and the Novák number of partially ordered sets
- Making the supercompactness of \(\nu\) indestructible under \(\nu\)-directed closed forcing
- On the Existence of κ-Free Abelian Groups
- Partitioning pairs of countable ordinals
- Squares, scales and stationary reflection
- The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy
- The theory of semisets
- Weakly Compact Cardinals and Nonspecial Aronszajn Trees
- When Does Almost Free Imply Free? (For Groups, Transversals, etc.)
- Weak square and stationary reflection
- Diagonal reflections on squares
- Two upper bounds on consistency strength of \(\neg \square_{\aleph_\omega}\) and stationary set reflection at two successive \(\aleph_n\)
- More notions of forcing add a Souslin tree
- Square and non-reflection in the context of \(\mathcal P_{\kappa}\lambda\)
- Squares, scales and stationary reflection
- On the weak reflection principle
- Partial square at \(\omega _1\) is implied by MM but not by PFA
- The non-compactness of square
- Subcompact cardinals, squares, and stationary reflection
- Simultaneous stationary reflection and square sequences
- Club stationary reflection and the special Aronszajn tree property
- Club stationary reflection and other combinatorial principles at \(\aleph_{ \omega +2}\)
- More on full reflection below \({\aleph_\omega}\)
This page was built for publication: Square and delta reflection
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q287476)