Squeezing arguments

DOI10.1093/ANALYS/ANQ120MaRDI QIDQ4648476zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors

Publication date 9 November 2012

Published in Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://semanticscholar.org/paper/0b9e1ea5ea281173d80abf48d42695a2dd480ca2

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Philosophy of mathematics (00A30)

Recommendations

• Computability, proof, and open-texture
• Proving Things About the Informal
• Church's thesis as formulated by Church -- an interpretation
• Church's thesis and its epistemological status
• Proving Church's thesis

Cited in

(10)

• Squeezing arguments and strong logics
• Squeezing arguments and the plurality of informal notions
• Validity, the squeezing argument and alternative semantic systems: the case of Aristotelian syllogistic
• Proving Church's thesis
• What is the correct logic of necessity, actuality and apriority?
• Intuitions, theory choice and the ameliorative character of logical theories
• Squeezing Feasibility
• The substitutional analysis of logical consequence
• The evidence approach to paraconsistency versus the paraconsistent approach to evidence
• Carnapian explication, formalisms as cognitive tools, and the paradox of adequate formalization

This page was built for publication: Squeezing arguments

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4648476)