Structurally stable homoclinic classes

DOI10.3934/DCDS.2016.36.1693MaRDI QIDQ256187zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Xiao Wen

Publication date 9 March 2016

Published in Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.4552

zbMATH Keywords

dominated splittinghomoclinic classhomoclinic tangencyhyperbolicitystructural stability

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Generic properties, structural stability of dynamical systems (37C20) Homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits for dynamical systems (37C29) Dynamical systems with hyperbolic orbits and sets (37D05) Uniformly hyperbolic systems (expanding, Anosov, Axiom A, etc.) (37D20) Partially hyperbolic systems and dominated splittings (37D30)

Abstract: In this paper we study structurally stable homoclinic classes. In a natural way, the structural stability for an individual homoclinic class is defined through the continuation of periodic points. Since the homoclinic classes is not innately locally maximal, it is hard to answer whether structurally stable homoclinic classes are hyperbolic. In this article, we make some progress on this question. We prove that if a homoclinic class is structurally stable, then it admits a dominated splitting. Moreover we prove that codimension one structurally stable classes are hyperbolic. Also, if the diffeomorphism is far away from homoclinic tangencies, then structurally stable homoclinic classes are hyperbolic.

Review text

Let \(p\) be a hyperbolic periodic point of a diffeomorphism \(f\). Consider the set \(H(p,f)\) which is the closure of the set of transverse intersections of the stable and unstable manifolds of the orbit of \(p\). The set \(H(p,f)\) is called the homoclinic class of \(p\). The author defines structural stability of a homoclinic class and shows thatNEWLINE{\parindent=0.7cmNEWLINE\begin{itemize}\item[(i)] a structurally stable homoclinic class admits a dominated splitting; NEWLINE\item[(ii)] a codimension-one homoclinic class is hyperbolic;NEWLINE\item[(iii)] if \(f\) is far from homoclinic tangencies, then its structurally stable homoclinic classes are hyperbolic.NEWLINENEWLINE\end{itemize}}

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2051100
• Robustly expansive homoclinic classes
• Structurally stable heteroclinic cycles
• Expansive homoclinic classes
• Generic bi-Lyapunov stable homoclinic classes
• Lyapunov stable homoclinic classes for smooth vector fields
• Periodically expansive homoclinic classes
• Homoclinic structures in infinite-dimensional systems
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4015220
• On bi-Lyapunov stable homoclinic classes

Cites work

• A \(C^1\)-generic dichotomy for diffeomorphisms: weak forms of hyperbolicity or infinitely many sinks of sources
• A proof of the C^ 1 stability conjecture
• An ergodic closing lemma
• Codimension one structurally stable chain classes
• Heteroclinic cycles and homoclinic closures for generic diffeomorphisms
• Homoclinic tangencies and hyperbolicity for surface diffeomorphisms
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3655039 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3772598 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3341031 (Why is no real title available?)
• Invariant manifolds
• Necessary Conditions for Stability of Diffeomorphisms
• On C^1-persistently expansive homoclinic classes
• On the hyperbolicity of homoclinic classes
• Partial hyperbolicity and homoclinic tangencies
• Partial hyperbolicity far from homoclinic bifurcations
• Periodic orbits and chain-transitive sets of \(C^1\)-diffeomorphisms
• Periodic points and homoclinic classes
• Recurrence and genericity

Cited in

(8)

• On the hyperbolicity of homoclinic classes
• Codimension one structurally stable chain classes
• Hyperbolicity versus weak periodic orbits inside homoclinic classes
• Robustly expansive codimension-one homoclinic classes are hyperbolic
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2051100 (Why is no real title available?)
• Stably limit shadowable homoclinic classes
• There are no proper topological hyperbolic homoclinic classes for area-preserving maps
• Hyperbolicity for conservative diffeomorphisms

This page was built for publication: Structurally stable homoclinic classes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q256187)