Hyperbolicity versus weak periodic orbits inside homoclinic classes

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3177874

DOI10.1017/ETDS.2016.122zbMATH Open1397.37029arXiv1504.03153OpenAlexW3102949970MaRDI QIDQ3177874FDOQ3177874

Xiaodong Wang

Publication date: 2 August 2018

Published in: Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We prove that, for C1-generic diffeomorphisms, if the periodic orbits contained in a homoclinic class H(p) have all their Lyapunov exponents bounded away from 0, then H(p) must be (uniformly) hyperbolic. This is in sprit of the works of the stability conjecture, but with a significant difference that the homoclinic class H(p) is not known isolated in advance, hence the "weak" periodic orbits created by perturbations near the homoclinic class have to be guaranteed strictly inside the homoclinic class. In this sense the problem is of an "intrinsic" nature, and the classical proof of the stability conjecture does not pass through. In particular, we construct in the proof several perturbations which are not simple applications of the connecting lemmas.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03153




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (14)





This page was built for publication: Hyperbolicity versus weak periodic orbits inside homoclinic classes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3177874)