The Big Bush machine

DOI10.1016/J.TOPOL.2010.07.037MaRDI QIDQ408556zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Harold Bennett, Dennis Burke, David Lutzer

Publication date 10 April 2012

Published in Topology and its Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2010.07.037

Special constructions of topological spaces (spaces of ultrafilters, etc.) (54D80) (p)-spaces, (M)-spaces, (sigma)-spaces, etc. (54E18) Baire category, Baire spaces (54E52) Linearly ordered topological spaces, generalized ordered spaces, and partially ordered spaces (54F05) Pathological topological spaces (54G15)

Review text

For \(S,T\subset\mathbb R\) non-empty and disjoint, let \(Bush(S,T)=\bigcup_{\alpha<\omega_1}\{f:[0,\alpha]\to S\cup T\;/\;f(\alpha)\in T \text{ and }\beta<\alpha\Rightarrow f(\beta)\in S\}\), topologised with the lexicographic order topology inherited from \(\mathbb R\). For \(S\) and \(T\) dense \(Bush(S,T)\) is monotonically normal, has a point-countable base, is hereditarily paracompact, \(\alpha\)-favourable and a Baire space (among many others) but is never Lindelöf, has no dense metrisable subspace, is not a \(\Sigma\)-space, a \(p\)-space or an \(M\)-space (among others). \(Bush(\mathbb P,\mathbb Q)\) and \(Bush(\mathbb Q,\mathbb P)\) are not homeomorphic. There are disjoint dense \(S,T\subset\mathbb R\) of cardinality \(2^\omega\) such that \(Bush(S,T)\) is not homeomorphic to \(Bush(T,S)\).

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(2)

This page was built for publication: The Big Bush machine

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q408556)