The algebraic semantics of interrogative NPs
The aim of the paper is to outline a new semantic interpretation of interrogative noun phrases (INPs), based on a novel algebraic theory of the semantics of questions. The INPs are interpreted as entities derived from the type t of propositions. The proposed extensional theory of question meanings interprets the type t of propositions as a billatice with five truth values, three indicative values (``known-to-be-false, ``known-to-be-true, ``unknown), and two interrogative values (``unresolved, ``resolved). Section 2 of the paper introduces the basic elements of the new INP semantics. Section 4 discusses the meaning of INPs and the compositional construction of the wh-question meanings based on the proposed framework. Section 4 shows how the INP coordination can be handled in a straightforward manner, including the coordination that combines indicative and interrogative NPs. Section 5 investigates the properties of INPs in the context of generalized quantifier theory.
- A semantic model for interrogatives based on generalized quantifiers and bilattices
- Algebraic foundations for the semantic treatment of inquisitive content
- Algebraic foundations for inquisitive semantics
- Inquisitive Semantics: Two Possibilities for Disjunction
- A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: \textit{an} answer, not necessarily \textit{the} answer
- Questions and answers in an orthoalgebraic approach
- A semantic model for interrogatives based on generalized quantifiers and bilattices
- Abstraction and Ontology: Questions as Propositional Abstracts in Type Theory with Records
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1952670 (Why is no real title available?)
- Algebraic foundations for the semantic treatment of inquisitive content
- A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: \textit{an} answer, not necessarily \textit{the} answer
- On Karttunen’s “The Syntax and Semantics of Questions”
- Post-suppositions and uninterpretable questions
- A structured witness approach to pair-list answers of \textit{wh}-questions with plural definites
- A modal interpretation of the logic of interrogation
This page was built for publication: The algebraic semantics of interrogative NPs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5931131)