The computational structure of progress conditions and shared objects
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- All of Us Are Smarter than Any of Us: Nondeterministic Wait-Free Hierarchies Are Not Robust
- Contention-Sensitive Data Structures and Algorithms
- Contention-sensitive data structures and algorithms
- Coordination without prior agreement
- Deterministic objects: life beyond consensus
- Distributed Computing
- Distributed Computing
- Distributed universality
- Failure detectors as type boosters
- Hundreds of impossibility results for distributed computing
- Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process
- On asymmetric progress conditions
- On the nonexistence of resilient consensus protocols
- On the uncontended complexity of consensus
- Reaching Agreement in the Presence of Faults
- Resilient consensus for infinitely many processes. (Extended abstract)
- Robust wait-free hierarchies
- Safety-liveness exclusion in distributed computing
- Set agreement power is not a precise characterization for oblivious deterministic anonymous objects
- The computational structure of progress conditions
- The concurrency hierarchy, and algorithms for unbounded concurrency
- The disagreement power of an adversary
- The topology of distributed adversaries
- The weakest failure detectors to boost obstruction-freedom
- Timeliness-based wait-freedom, a gracefully degrading progress condition
- Toward a theory of transactional contention managers
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: The computational structure of progress conditions and shared objects
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1988520)