The effectiveness of bootstrap methods in evaluating skewed auditing populations: a simulation study

DOI10.1080/00949659608811731MaRDI QIDQ4355607zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Howard R. Clayton

Publication date 21 September 1997

Published in Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00949659608811731

zbMATH Keywords

\(t\)-pivotbootstrap methodsconfidence boundsdollar unit sampling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Nonparametric statistical resampling methods (62G09) Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions (62G15)

Recommendations

• Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy
• Bootstrap and other methods to measure errors in survey estimates
• Publication:3490775
• Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. With a comment by J. A. Hartigan and a rejoinder by the authors
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1264857

Cites work

• Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
• Nonparametric Confidence Limits by Resampling Methods and Least Favorable Families
• Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals
• Theoretical comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals

Cited in

(1)

• Combining approaches for evaluating auditing populations: A simulation study

This page was built for publication: The effectiveness of bootstrap methods in evaluating skewed auditing populations: a simulation study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4355607)