The finite matroid-based valuation conjecture is false

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: The matroid-based valuation conjecture of Ostrovsky and Paes Leme states that all gross substitutes valuations on n items can be produced from merging and endowments of weighted ranks of matroids defined on at most m(n) items. We show that if m(n)=n, then this statement holds for nleq3 and fails for all ngeq4. In particular, the set of gross substitutes valuations on ngeq4 items is strictly larger than the set of matroid based valuations defined on the ground set [n]. Our proof uses matroid theory and discrete convex analysis to explicitly construct a large family of counter-examples. It indicates that merging and endowment by themselves are poor operations to generate gross substitutes valuations. We also connect the general MBV conjecture and related questions to long-standing open problems in matroid theory, and conclude with open questions at the intersection of this field and economics.



Cites work



Describes a project that uses

Uses Software






This page was built for publication: The finite matroid-based valuation conjecture is false

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4959128)