The geometry of relations

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: There is a canonical way to associate two simplicial complexes K, L to any relation RsubsetXimesY. Moreover, the geometric realizations of K and L are homotopy equivalent. This was studied in the fifties by C.H. Dowker. In this article we prove a Galois-type correspondence for relations RsubsetXimesY when X is fixed and use these constructions to investigate finite posets (or equivalently, finite topological spaces) from a geometrical point of view. Given any poset (X,leq), we define the simplicial complexes K, L associated to the relation leq. In many cases these polyhedra have the same homotopy type as the standard simplicial complex C of nonempty finite chains in X. We give a complete characterization of the simplicial complexes that are the K or L-complexes of some finite poset and prove that K and L are geometrically equivalent to the smaller complexes K',L' induced by the relation <. More precisely, we prove that K (resp. L) simplicially collapses to K' (resp. L').


Classically a finite poset \((X, \leq)\) gives rise to a topological space by constructing the simplicial complex \(\Delta_{X}\) of its finite chains. This paper defines two simplicial complexes \(K_{X}\) and \(L_{X}\) associated to a relation \(\leq\) on \(X\). Roughly these complexes are defined from the subset \(R \subset X \times X\) given by the relation. The \(n\)-simplexes of \(L_{X}\) are the subsets \(\{ x_{0},\dots,x_{n}\}\) of \(X\) such that there exists \(y \in X\) with \(x_{i} \leq y\) for all \(i\). The simplexes of \(L_{X}\) are the subsets of \(X\) with a common lower bound \(z \in X\). In many cases these polyhedra have the same homotopy type as \(\Delta_{X}\). The paper gives a complete characterization of the simplicial complexes that are the \(K\) or \(L\) complexes of some finite poset and shows that the complexes are topologically equivalent to the ones obtained from the smaller poset induced by \(<\) (as opposed to \(\leq\)). In fact the author shows that the larger complexes collapse onto the smaller ones.











This page was built for publication: The geometry of relations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q981684)