The importance of open and recursive circumscription
The problems of inconsistency, incompleteness etc. of circumscription are considered. \textit{P. L. Mott} [Artif. Intell. 31, 87-98 (1987; Zbl 0624.68082)] proposed two restrictions of standad circumscription, called closed and non-recursive circumscription. Mott's propositions are criticized here. In particular, closed circumscription used very unnaturally binding of free variables in substitutional frameworks. According to the authors, Mott's restrictions are too hard. The arguments for open and recursive circumscription \((=\) standard) are given.
- A theorem on the consistency of circumscription
- Circumscription - a form of non-monotonic reasoning
- Circumscription and implicit definability
- Completeness results for circumscription
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 194618 (Why is no real title available?)
- Logic and structure.
- On the satisfiability of circumscription
- Saturation, nonmonotonic reasoning and the closed-world assumption
- The mathematics of non-monotonic reasoning
This page was built for publication: The importance of open and recursive circumscription
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1117210)