The inelastic market hypothesis: a microstructural interpretation
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We attempt to reconcile Gabaix and Koijen's (GK) recent Inelastic Market Hypothesis (IMH) with the order-driven view of markets that emerged within the microstructure literature in the past 20 years. We review the most salient empirical facts and arguments that give credence to the idea that market price fluctuations are mostly due to order flow, whether informed or non-informed. We show that the Latent Liquidity Theory of price impact makes a precise prediction for GK's multiplier , which measures by how many dollars, on average, the market value of a company goes up if one buys one dollar worth of its stocks. Our central result is that is of order unity, as found by GK, and increases with the volatility of the stock and decreases with the fraction of the market cap. traded daily. We discuss several empirical results suggesting that the lion's share of volatility is due to trading activity. We argue that the IMH holds for all asset classes, beyond the case of stock markets considered by GK.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A fully consistent, minimal model for nonlinear market impact
- Co-existence of trend and value in financial markets: estimating an extended Chiarella model
- Co-impact: crowding effects in institutional trading activity
- Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading
- Do supply and demand drive stock prices?
- Endogenous liquidity crises
- Exogenous and endogenous price jumps belong to different dynamical classes
- Fluctuations and response in financial markets: the subtle nature of `random' price changes
- From Walras' auctioneer to continuous time double auctions: a general dynamic theory of supply and demand
- How does latent liquidity get revealed in the limit order book?
- How efficiency shapes market impact
- Market efficiency and the long-memory of supply and demand: is price impact variable and permanent or fixed and temporary?
- Market impact with multi-timescale liquidity
- Random walks, liquidity molasses and critical response in financial markets
- Relation between bid–ask spread, impact and volatility in order-driven markets
Cited in
(5)- Market Microstructure Invariance: Empirical Hypotheses
- Calibrating doubly-robust estimators with unbalanced treatment assignment
- Discretization of continuous-time arbitrage strategies in financial markets with fractional Brownian motion
- The ‘double’ square-root law: evidence for the mechanical origin of market impact using Tokyo stock exchange data
- The subtle interplay between square-root impact, order imbalance & volatility: a unifying framework
This page was built for publication: The inelastic market hypothesis: a microstructural interpretation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5041659)