The transfer is functorial

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We prove that the Becker-Gottlieb transfer is functorial up to homotopy, for all fibrations with finitely dominated fibers. This resolves a lingering foundational question about the transfer, which was originally defined in the late 1970s in order to simplify the proof of the Adams conjecture. Our approach differs from previous attempts in that we closely emulate the geometric argument in the case of a smooth fiber bundle. This leads to a "multiplicative'" description of the transfer, different from the standard presentation as the trace of a diagonal map.


A transfer is a construction that takes a map $p: X \to Y$ to some ``wrong way map $p!: Y\to X$. \textit{F. W. Roush} [Transfer in generalized cohomology theories. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó (1999; Zbl 0991.55006); Princeton University (PhD Thesis) (1972)] defined a transfer for finite covering spaces $X \to Y$ as a stable wrong way map $\Sigma^\infty Y_+ \to \Sigma^\infty X_+$. This idea was expanded on by \textit{J. C. Becker} and \textit{D. H. Gottlieb} [Topology 14, 1--12 (1975; Zbl 0306.55017)] to define transfers for smooth fiber bundles with closed manifold fiber. Then, those authors [loc. cit.] produced a purely homotopy theoretic construction of the transfer using fiberwise $S$-duality, thereby extending the definition to the class of Hurewicz fibrations with finitely dominated fibers. As the Pontryagin-Thom construction is functorial on compositions of embeddings, it is straightforward to deduce that for any composition of smooth fiber bundles with closed manifold fibers $X\xrightarrow{p} Y\xrightarrow{q}Z$ the transfer is functorial up to homotopy, $(q\circ p)!\simeq p! \circ q!$. \par Given that the transfer is defined for a larger class of fibrations, it is reasonable to ask how much more generally functoriality holds. The authors resolve a lingering foundational question about the transfer and prove in Theorem A that the Becker-Gottlieb transfer is functorial up to homotopy, for all fibrations with finitely dominated fibers. This leads to a ``multiplicative description of the transfer, different from the standard presentation as the trace of a diagonal map. Editorial remark: In the corrigendum to this paper [\textit{J. R. Klein} and \textit{C. Malkiewich}, Adv. Math. 410 B, Article ID 108752, 2 p. (2022; Zbl 1502.55012)], the authors highlight an error. ``As a result of this error, the question of functoriality is once again open.











This page was built for publication: The transfer is functorial

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1789508)