The weak subintegral closure of a monomial ideal

DOI10.1080/00927879908826781MaRDI QIDQ4700497zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Les Reid, Marie A. Vitulli

Publication date 29 May 2001

Published in Communications in Algebra (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00927879908826781

zbMATH Keywords

algorithmsnormalization of the Rees ringseminormalizationsubintegral closureweak normalization

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Integral closure of commutative rings and ideals (13B22) Polynomial rings and ideals; rings of integer-valued polynomials (13F20) Seminormal rings (13F45) Computational aspects and applications of commutative rings (13P99) Varieties defined by ring conditions (factorial, Cohen-Macaulay, seminormal) (14M05)

Review text

The seminormalization (resp. weak normalization) of a commutative ring \(A\) in an integral extension \(B\) is a ring such that \(\text{Spec}(B) \to\text{Spec}(A)\) is bijective and with bijective (resp. purely inseparable) residue class field extensions. In order to describe the weak normalization of the Rees ring of an ideal, \textit{L. G. Roberts} and \textit{B. Singh} introduced the weak subintegral closure of an ideal [Compos. Math. 85, No. 3, 249-279 (1993; Zbl 0782.13006)]. No general-purpose algorithms for computing seminormalizations or weak normalizations seem to be known. The authors start to address this computational problem by considering the case of monomial ideals. They prove that the weak subintegral closure of a monomial ideal is again monomial by showing that the weak normalization of a multi-graded ring is again multi-graded. Furthermore, they give algebraic and geometric descriptions of the weak subintegral closure of a monomial ideal. Thus they are able to calculate some examples of monomial ideals in two indeterminates. As an application, they give an example which shows that the (2,3)-closure in the sense of \textit{S. Oda} and \textit{K.-I. Yoshida} [Math. J. Okayama Univ. 34, 1-12 (1992; Zbl 0822.13010)] can be a proper subset of the weak subintegral closure of an ideal.

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1568878
• Weak normalization in graded extensions and weak subintegral closure of ideals
• The weak subintegral closure of an ideal

Cites work

• A new criterion for weak subintegrality¹
• Homeomorphism versus isomorphism for varieties
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 639543 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 835749 (Why is no real title available?)
• On seminormality
• On the \(R\)-invariance of \(R[X]\)
• On weak subintegrality
• Seminormal graded rings and weakly normal projective varieties
• Some results on weakly normal ring extensions
• The structure of generic subintegrality

Cited in

(7)

• Monomial subrings and systems of subintegrality
• Weak normalization in graded extensions and weak subintegral closure of ideals
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1568878 (Why is no real title available?)
• Generalized Samuel multiplicities of monomial ideals and volumes
• Powers of Elements and Monomial Ideals^#
• Monomial subrings in arbitrary dimension
• Weak subintegral closure of ideals

This page was built for publication: The weak subintegral closure of a monomial ideal

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4700497)