Tight closure commutes with localization in binomial rings
From MaRDI portal
Characteristic (p) methods (Frobenius endomorphism) and reduction to characteristic (p); tight closure (13A35) Integral closure of commutative rings and ideals (13B22) Rings of fractions and localization for commutative rings (13B30) Gröbner bases; other bases for ideals and modules (e.g., Janet and border bases) (13P10)
Abstract: It is proved that tight closure commutes with localization in any domain which has a module finite extension in which tight closure is known to commute with localization. It follows that tight closure commutes with localization in binomial rings, in particular in semigroup or toric rings.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Binomial ideals
- Hilbert-Kunz function of monomial ideals and binomial hypersurfaces
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 482758 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 863015 (Why is no real title available?)
- Linear Bounds on Growth of Associated Primes
- Localization of tight closure and modules of finite phantom projective dimension.
- The complexity of Frobenius powers of ideals
- Tight Closure, Invariant Theory, and the Briancon-Skoda Theorem
Cited in
(7)- On the localization theorem for \(F\)-pure rings
- The blowup closure of a set of ideals with applications to \(TI\) closure.
- Localization of tight closure in two-dimensional rings
- Ideals in a perfect closure, linear growth of primary decompositions, and tight closure
- A dual to tight closure theory
- Closure operations in complete local rings of mixed characteristic
- Tight closure does not commute with localization
This page was built for publication: Tight closure commutes with localization in binomial rings
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4523187)