Upwards closed dependencies in team semantics
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We prove that adding upwards closed first-order dependency atoms to first-order logic with team semantics does not increase its expressive power (with respect to sentences), and that the same remains true if we also add constancy atoms. As a consequence, the negations of functional dependence, conditional independence, inclusion and exclusion atoms can all be added to first-order logic without increasing its expressive power. Furthermore, we define a class of bounded upwards closed dependencies and we prove that unbounded dependencies cannot be defined in terms of bounded ones.
Recommendations
- Upwards closed dependencies in team semantics
- Polyteam semantics
- Polyteam semantics
- Safe dependency atoms and possibility operators in team semantics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7447734
- Probabilistic team semantics
- The doxastic interpretation of team semantics
- Iterated team semantics for a hierarchy of informational types
- Inclusion and exclusion dependencies in team semantics -- on some logics of imperfect information
- Approximation and dependence via multiteam semantics
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6680142 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3464827 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4118333 (Why is no real title available?)
- A normal form for relational databases that is based on domains and keys
- Axioms and algorithms for inferences involving probabilistic independence
- Coherence and computational complexity of quantifier-free dependence logic formulas
- Compositional semantics for a language of imperfect information
- Dependence and independence
- Dependence logic. A new approach to independence friendly logic
- Generalized quantifiers in dependence logic
- Inclusion and exclusion dependencies in team semantics -- on some logics of imperfect information
- Independence-friendly logic. A game-theoretic approach
- Team Logic and Second-Order Logic
Cited in
(14)- Safe dependency atoms and possibility operators in team semantics
- Team semantics for interventionist counterfactuals: observations vs. interventions
- Doubly strongly first order dependencies
- On the succinctness of atoms of dependency
- Strongly first order, domain independent dependencies: the union-closed case
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7453077 (Why is no real title available?)
- Characterizing downwards closed, strongly first-order, relativizable dependencies
- Upwards closed dependencies in team semantics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7447734 (Why is no real title available?)
- On strongly first-order dependencies
- On definability of team relations with \(k\)-invariant atoms
- On the Presburger fragment of logics with multiteam semantics
- On the complexity of team logic and its two-variable fragment
- Canonical models and the complexity of modal team logic
This page was built for publication: Upwards closed dependencies in team semantics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q897651)