Using a Bayesian approach to quantify scale compatibility bias

DOI10.1287/MNSC.48.12.1555.444MaRDI QIDQ3114819zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Richard M. Anderson, B. F. Hobbs

Publication date 19 February 2012

Published in Management Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.12.1555.444

zbMATH Keywords

additive multiattribute value modelBayesian linear regressionbias random errormultiattribute weightsmulticriteria decision makingscale compatibility

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Case-oriented studies in operations research (90B90)

Recommendations

• “Bi-Matching”: A New Preference Assessment Method to Reduce Compatibility Effects
• Interactive weight assessment in multiple attribute decision making
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4185383
• On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods.
• Toward an improved methodology to construct and reconcile decision analytic preference judgments

Cited in

(5)

• If nudge cannot be applied: a litmus test of the readers' stance on paternalism
• On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis
• Toward an improved methodology to construct and reconcile decision analytic preference judgments
• Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method
• Partition dependence and carryover biases in subjective probability assessment surveys for continuous variables: model-based estimation and correction

This page was built for publication: Using a Bayesian approach to quantify scale compatibility bias

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3114819)