Validity as a primitive

DOI10.1093/ANALYS/ANS064MaRDI QIDQ4924012zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Jeffrey Ketland

Publication date 30 May 2013

Published in Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/ans064

zbMATH Keywords

truthparadoxPeano arithmeticvalidityconsistent theory

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• There is no paradox of logical validity
• The inexpressibility of validity
• Principles for object-linguistic consequence: from logical to irreflexive
• Disarming a paradox of validity
• Faithfulness for naive validity

Cited in

(17)

• Paradox and logical revision. A short introduction
• Higher-level paradoxes and substructural solutions
• Hypothesis-discharging rules in atomic bases
• Principles for object-linguistic consequence: from logical to irreflexive
• The inexpressibility of validity
• Validity in a dialetheist framework
• Expressing validity: towards a self-sufficient inferentialism
• How to classify varieties of consequence
• Should theories of logical validity self-apply?
• There is no paradox of logical validity
• Naive structure, contraction and paradox
• Faithfulness for naive validity
• Validity, dialetheism and self-reference
• Reasoning with truth
• A validity theory for the ST-hierarchy
• Towards a non-classical meta-theory for substructural approaches to paradox
• Validity

This page was built for publication: Validity as a primitive

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4924012)