There is no paradox of logical validity

DOI10.1007/S11787-014-0094-4MaRDI QIDQ2254573zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Roy T. Cook

Publication date 5 February 2015

Published in Logica Universalis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-014-0094-4

zbMATH Keywords

Alfred TarskiCurry paradoxfirst-order logiclogical consequenceparadoxvalidity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Classical first-order logic (03B10)

Recommendations

• Validity as a primitive
• Disarming a paradox of validity
• Faithfulness for naive validity
• The Soundness Paradox
• A note on contraction-free logic for validity

Cites work

• A paradox regained
• Computability and Logic
• Dialetheism, logical consequence and hierarchy
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1170091 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2101980 (Why is no real title available?)
• Saving truth from paradox
• The T-schema is not a logical truth
• Validity as a primitive
• Which modal logic is the right one?

Cited in

(20)

• The validity paradox in modal \(\text{S}_5\)
• Emptying a paradox of ground
• Paradox and logical revision. A short introduction
• Naive structure, contraction and paradox
• Faithfulness for naive validity
• Validity, dialetheism and self-reference
• Towards a non-classical meta-theory for substructural approaches to paradox
• Naive modus ponens and failure of transitivity
• Degrees of validity and the logical paradoxes
• The overgeneration argument(s): a succinct refutation
• Validity in a dialetheist framework
• The Soundness Paradox
• Validity as a primitive
• External curries
• Disarming a paradox of validity
• Against logical generalism
• Higher-level paradoxes and substructural solutions
• Principles for object-linguistic consequence: from logical to irreflexive
• Should theories of logical validity self-apply?
• A validity theory for the ST-hierarchy

This page was built for publication: There is no paradox of logical validity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2254573)