Varieties whose skeletons are lattices

In Algebra Logika 24, No. 5, 588-607 (1985; Zbl 0619.08005), we introduced the notions of epimorphism and embeddability skeletons of a variety of algebras and studied them in more detail for the case of congruence distributive (c.d.) varieties in a series of subsequent publications. In Algebra Logika 27, No. 3, 316-326 (1988; Zbl 0666.08004), we noted that the skeletons in question take the position between ``thin congruence lattices of free algebras, lattices of subalgebras of universal algebras (their skeletons are, respectively, antiisotonical and isotonical images), and ``rough lattices of subvarieties (these lattices are isotonical images of skeletons). In connection with the above we raise the following question: Is it always the case, and if not then in what cases, are the epimorphism and embeddability skeletons of a variety of algebras lattices in their own right? In the present note we consider this problem for the case of c.d. varieties.

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(9)

This page was built for publication: Varieties whose skeletons are lattices

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2366360)