When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?
From MaRDI portal
Central limit and other weak theorems (60F05) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to statistics (62-02) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)
Recommendations
- Author's response: ``When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?
- Meta-analysis with fixed, unknown, study-specific parameters
- Reducing the Number of Unjustified Significant Results in Meta-analysis
- An Alternative Method for Meta-Analysis
- Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review
Cites work
- A modified random-effect procedure for combining risk difference in sets of 2×2 tables from clinical trials
- An Alternative Method for Meta-Analysis
- Assessing the Amount of Heterogeneity in Random‐Effects Meta‐Analysis
- Consensus Values and Weighting Factors
- Hans van Houwelingen and the art of summing up
- Integrated likelihood inference in small sample meta-analysis for continuous outcomes
- Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
- Meta-analysis of Binary Data Using Profile Likelihood
- Meta‐analysis of clinical trials with rare events
- Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons
- Nonparametric estimation of heterogeneity variance for the standardised difference used in meta-analysis
- On random-effects meta-analysis
- Recent Developments in Computer-Assisted Analysis of Mixtures
- Some general points in estimating heterogeneity variance with the DerSimonian-Laird estimator
- Testing for homogeneity in meta-analysis. I. The one-parameter case: standardized mean difference
- Valid Inference in Random Effects Meta‐Analysis
Cited in
(21)- Investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of studies with rare events. Estimating the amount of heterogeneity
- Contribution to the discussion of “When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?”
- Author's response: ``When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?
- On the exact null-distribution of a test for homogeneity of the risk ratio in meta-analysis of studies with rare events
- Jointly pooling aggregated effect sizes and their standard errors from studies with continuous clinical outcomes
- Frequentist performances of Bayesian prediction intervals for random‐effects meta‐analysis
- A bias‐corrected meta‐analysis model for combining, studies of different types and quality
- Bounds for the weight of external data in shrinkage estimation
- Random‐effects meta‐analysis models for the odds ratio in the case of rare events under different data‐generating models: A simulation study
- Sensitivity analysis with iterative outlier detection for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- A Bayesian nonparametric meta-analysis model for estimating the reference interval
- Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta-analysis
- Multistep estimators of the between-study covariance matrix under the multivariate random-effects model for meta-analysis
- Estimating risk and rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the Mantel-Haenszel estimator and assessing heterogeneity
- Combining chains of Bayesian models with Markov melding
- Vine copula mixed models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard
- A bivariate finite mixture random effects model for identifying and accommodating outliers in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses
- A new frequentist implementation of the Daniels and Hughes bivariate meta-analysis model for surrogate endpoint evaluation
- An one-factor copula mixed model for joint meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests
- Objective Bayesian meta-analysis based on generalized marginal multivariate random effects model
- Random-effects meta-analysis via generalized linear mixed models: a Bartlett-corrected approach for few studies
This page was built for publication: When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4622547)
