Why I am not a Bayesian

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_8MaRDI QIDQ2971674zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Clark Glymour

Publication date 7 April 2017

Published in Readings in Formal Epistemology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_8

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1746706
• Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian?
• Bayes not Bust! Why Simplicity is no Problem for Bayesians
• We are all Bayesian, everyone is not a Bayesian
• Things Bayes can't do
• In defence of objective Bayesianism
• A polemic for Bayesian statistics

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3434895 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3273020 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3060434 (Why is no real title available?)
• Subjective probability: Criticisms, reflections, and problems

Cited in

(7)

• A-symmetric confirmation and anthropic skepticism
• The rehabilitation of deductive reasoning
• Why are good theories good? Reflections on epistemic values, confirmation, and formal epistemology
• The no alternatives argument
• Truth in evidence and truth in arguments without logical omniscience
• Delimiting the unconceived
• Bayesian confirmation: a means with no end

This page was built for publication: Why I am not a Bayesian

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2971674)