Diameter and inverse degree (Q2470432): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Using minimum degree to bound average distance / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The average distance and the independence number / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Average distance and independence number / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4944680 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4387721 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3832606 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3781134 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3197865 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4337509 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the sum of all distances in a graph or digraph / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:54, 27 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Diameter and inverse degree
scientific article

    Statements

    Diameter and inverse degree (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 February 2008
    0 references
    Let \(G\) be a connected graph on \(n\) vertices and with minimum degree \(\delta\). The average distance \(\mu(G)\) of \(G\) is defined as the average of the distances between all unordered pairs of vertices of \(G\). The inverse degree \(r(G)\) is defined as the sum of the inverses of the degrees of the vertices of \(G\). This paper is motivated by the GRAFFITI conjecture that \(\mu(G)\leq r(G)\). \textit{P. Erdős, J. Pach} and \textit{J. Spencer} [Congr. Numer. 64, 121--124 (1998; Zbl 0677.05053)] disproved the conjecture by constructing an infinite class of graphs with average distance at least \((\frac{2}{3}\lfloor \frac{r(G)}{3}\rfloor + \text{o}(1))\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}\). They also proved that \((6r(G) + 2+ \text (o)(1))\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}\) is an upper bound on the diameter of \(G\) which is therefore also an upper bound on the average distance since \(\mu(G)\) is at most equal to the diameter of \(G\). In this paper the authors improve this upper bound by a factor of two showing that the diameter of \(G\) (and hence \(\mu(G)\)) is at most equal to \((3r(G) + 2+ \text (o)(1))\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    average distance
    0 references
    inverse distance
    0 references
    diameter
    0 references
    0 references