Essential dimension of algebraic groups and integral representations of Weyl groups (Q1770200): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Nicole Marie Anne Lemire / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Nicole Marie Anne Lemire / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-004-9003-x / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2053991894 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 21:46, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Essential dimension of algebraic groups and integral representations of Weyl groups
scientific article

    Statements

    Essential dimension of algebraic groups and integral representations of Weyl groups (English)
    0 references
    11 April 2005
    0 references
    Let \(G\) be a simple algebraic group over the complex numbers. The essential dimension \(\text{ed}(G)\) of \(G\) is the minimum dimension that a variety \(Y\) with free \(G\) action may have, if one requires the existence of a dominant equivariant map onto \(Y\) from an open subset of a linear \(G\) variety. The aim of this paper is to get better upper estimates on \(\text{ed}(G)\). To this end the author introduces for an integer lattice \(L\) with an action of the Weyl group \(W\) a variant \(\text{ed}_W(L)\) of essential dimension, formulated entirely in terms of \(W\)-lattices. If \(G\) is simple of adjoint type it is shown that \(\text{ed}(G)\leq\text{ed}_W(\mathbb Z\Phi)\), where \(\mathbb Z\Phi\) is the root lattice. So now it becomes a problem of bounding \(\text{ed}_W(\mathbb Z\Phi)\). Some general results are obtained and many special ones, also bounding some other \(\text{ed}_W(L)\). Here are a few general estimates, always with \(G\) adjoint of rank \(n\). If \(G\) is not of type \(\text{A}_1\) or \(\text{B}_n\), let \(\Phi_0\) consist of the short roots. Then \(\text{ed}_W(\mathbb Z\Phi)\leq | \Phi_0| -n-1\). And if \(G\) is of type \(\text{A}_1\) or \(\text{B}_n\), then \(\text{ed}_W(\mathbb Z\Phi)\leq 2n\). Further, for \(n\geq4\), \(\text{ed}(\text{PGL}_n)\leq \text{ed}_{S_n}(\mathbb Z\text{A}_{n-1})\leq n^2-3n+1\).
    0 references
    permutation module
    0 references
    root lattice
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references