Counterexamples to a conjecture about bottlenecks in non-Tait-colourable cubic graphs (Q1356437): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Hian Poh Yap / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3035306 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Infinite Families of Nontrivial Trivalent Graphs Which are Not Tait Colorable / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:09, 27 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Counterexamples to a conjecture about bottlenecks in non-Tait-colourable cubic graphs
scientific article

    Statements

    Counterexamples to a conjecture about bottlenecks in non-Tait-colourable cubic graphs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    9 June 1997
    0 references
    A bottleneck in a non-Tait-colourable cubic graph \(G= (V,E)\) is a minimal set \(\mathcal B\) of odd cuts such that, for any \(S\subseteq E\), either \(S\) or \(E\backslash S\) contains at least one member of \(\mathcal B\). F. Holroyd and F. Loupekine conjectured that in any non-Tait-colourable bridgeless cubic graph, the cuts of orders 3 and 5 form a bottleneck. E. Steffen proves that this conjecture is not true for any cyclically 6-edge non-Tait-colourable cubic graph.
    0 references
    Tait colouring
    0 references
    bottleneck
    0 references
    cubic graph
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers