Neighborhood conditions for balanced independent sets in bipartite graphs (Q1381845): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q426905
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Mark E. Watkins / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5615282 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A generalization of Ore's Theorem involving neighborhood unions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Neighbourhood unions and Hamiltonian properties in graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Neighborhood unions and hamilton cycles / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Hamiltonian bipartite graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cycles and Connectivity in Graphs / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:55, 28 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Neighborhood conditions for balanced independent sets in bipartite graphs
scientific article

    Statements

    Neighborhood conditions for balanced independent sets in bipartite graphs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 June 1998
    0 references
    Let us assume that \(\Gamma\) is a balanced bipartite graph (i.e., \(\Gamma\) admits a bipartition into two independent vertex sets with the same cardinality) of order \(2n\) in which all valences are \(\geq3\). We assume further that the neighborhood \(N(S)\) of any independent 4-subset \(S\) of \(V(\Gamma)\) consisting of two vertices from each side of the bipartition satisfies \(|N(S)|>n\). In this clearly-written, well-motivated, example-rich paper, the following conclusions are deduced: \(\Gamma\) is either Hamiltonian or contains a spanning subgraph consisting of a cycle and an isolated edge; \(\Gamma\) is traceable; \(\Gamma\) either has a 2-factor or belongs to a small subclass of examples in which \(n=7\). It is conjectured that under the above assumptions, \(\Gamma\) is Hamiltonian or belongs to this small subclass. By sharpening the inequality to \(|N(S)|>n+2\), the authors show that \(\Gamma\) is in fact Hamiltonian.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Hamiltonian
    0 references
    neighborhood union
    0 references
    bipartite graph
    0 references
    independent set
    0 references
    traceable
    0 references
    perfect matching
    0 references