Some remarks on the computation of Pythagoras numbers of real irreducible algebroid curves through Gram matrices. (Q1429893): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q590015
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Jose Manuel Gamboa / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2003.07.023 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1984365318 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Pythagoras number of some affine algebras and local algebras. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Pythagoras numbers of real irreducible algebroid curves and Gram matrices / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:21, 6 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some remarks on the computation of Pythagoras numbers of real irreducible algebroid curves through Gram matrices.
scientific article

    Statements

    Some remarks on the computation of Pythagoras numbers of real irreducible algebroid curves through Gram matrices. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 May 2004
    0 references
    In a previous paper [\textit{R. Quarez}, J. Algebra, 238, No. 1, 139--158 (2001; Zbl 1044.14031)] the second author obtained an algorithm to study lengths of sums of squares in the ring \(A\) of a real algebroid curve. As a corollary, the Pythagoras number of \(A\) is upperly bounded by its multiplicity. The proof involves the solvability of a system of linear equations and the case with infinitely many solutions is reduced to the one with a unique solution by means of ``Efroymson trick'', that is, by adding an infinitesimal \(\varepsilon\) to some coefficients. Of course, the argument finishes with \(\varepsilon\to 0\), and at this point some difficulty occurs in the original paper by Quarez. The authors of the short note under review avoid such difficulty with elementary methods and a very clever idea.
    0 references

    Identifiers