Some remarks on the computation of Pythagoras numbers of real irreducible algebroid curves through Gram matrices. (Q1429893): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q590015 |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Jose Manuel Gamboa / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2003.07.023 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1984365318 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The Pythagoras number of some affine algebras and local algebras. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Pythagoras numbers of real irreducible algebroid curves and Gram matrices / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 16:21, 6 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Some remarks on the computation of Pythagoras numbers of real irreducible algebroid curves through Gram matrices. |
scientific article |
Statements
Some remarks on the computation of Pythagoras numbers of real irreducible algebroid curves through Gram matrices. (English)
0 references
27 May 2004
0 references
In a previous paper [\textit{R. Quarez}, J. Algebra, 238, No. 1, 139--158 (2001; Zbl 1044.14031)] the second author obtained an algorithm to study lengths of sums of squares in the ring \(A\) of a real algebroid curve. As a corollary, the Pythagoras number of \(A\) is upperly bounded by its multiplicity. The proof involves the solvability of a system of linear equations and the case with infinitely many solutions is reduced to the one with a unique solution by means of ``Efroymson trick'', that is, by adding an infinitesimal \(\varepsilon\) to some coefficients. Of course, the argument finishes with \(\varepsilon\to 0\), and at this point some difficulty occurs in the original paper by Quarez. The authors of the short note under review avoid such difficulty with elementary methods and a very clever idea.
0 references