The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics (Q1069923): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and `coupled trees' / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Kripke-style semantics for R-mingle using a binary accessibility relation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3701398 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The semantics of entailment. III / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A semantical study of constructible falsity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3474640 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:27, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics
scientific article

    Statements

    The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    The paper shows how the Dunn semantics for first degree entailment can be extended to semantics for many (higher degree) relevant logics. The truth conditions of formulas are given using a ternary relation, R, familiar from Routley/Meyer semantics. The main novelty is in giving the falsity conditions of formulas in terms of another ternary relation, S, which behaves dually to R. This method encounters problems with certain of the stronger relevant systems, and various ways around the problems are canvassed. The successful ways are rather artificial or tend to reintroduce the * operation of Routley/Meyer semantics. The same ground is covered in Ch. 4, Section 7, of \textit{R. Routley}: Relevant logics and their rivals. Part I (1982; Zbl 0579.03011).
    0 references
    0 references
    Dunn semantics
    0 references
    relevant logics
    0 references
    truth conditions
    0 references
    Routley/Meyer semantics
    0 references
    falsity conditions
    0 references

    Identifiers