The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics (Q1069923): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and `coupled trees' / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A Kripke-style semantics for R-mingle using a binary accessibility relation / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3701398 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The semantics of entailment. III / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A semantical study of constructible falsity / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3474640 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:27, 17 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics |
scientific article |
Statements
The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics (English)
0 references
1984
0 references
The paper shows how the Dunn semantics for first degree entailment can be extended to semantics for many (higher degree) relevant logics. The truth conditions of formulas are given using a ternary relation, R, familiar from Routley/Meyer semantics. The main novelty is in giving the falsity conditions of formulas in terms of another ternary relation, S, which behaves dually to R. This method encounters problems with certain of the stronger relevant systems, and various ways around the problems are canvassed. The successful ways are rather artificial or tend to reintroduce the * operation of Routley/Meyer semantics. The same ground is covered in Ch. 4, Section 7, of \textit{R. Routley}: Relevant logics and their rivals. Part I (1982; Zbl 0579.03011).
0 references
Dunn semantics
0 references
relevant logics
0 references
truth conditions
0 references
Routley/Meyer semantics
0 references
falsity conditions
0 references