A length-width inequality for partially ordered sets with two-element cutsets (Q1124616): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8956(89)90044-0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1996427104 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Compact Spaces and Spaces of Maximal Complete Subgraphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The length, the width and the cutset-number of finite ordered sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Antichains and Finite Sets that Meet all Maximal Chains / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Finite cutsets and finite antichains / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:26, 20 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A length-width inequality for partially ordered sets with two-element cutsets
scientific article

    Statements

    A length-width inequality for partially ordered sets with two-element cutsets (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    Let P be a finite poset and \(x\in P\). A cutset for x is each set \(C\subseteq P\) such that (i) \(x\| C\) (that is, x is noncomparable with a for \(a\in C)\) and (ii) every maximal chain in P intersects \(C\cup \{x\}\). A poset P has the m-cutset property if every element of P has a cutset with at most m elements. Let w(P) denote the width of the poset P and let \(\ell (P)\) denote the number of elements of the largest chain in P. The connections between w(P) and \(\ell (P)\) are studied in the paper. It is proved (Theorem 1) that if P is a finite poset with the 2-cutset property, then \(\ell (P)\geq w(P)-2\), and that this result is best possible. A similar inequality is also given for posets with the m-cutset property for \(m>2\).
    0 references
    0 references
    finite poset
    0 references
    m-cutset property
    0 references
    width
    0 references
    largest chain
    0 references
    2-cutset property
    0 references
    0 references