Undominated candidate strategies under alternative voting rules (Q583067): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(89)90416-0 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2097589584 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3323629 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A new definition of a Stieltjes integral / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Condorcet Social Choice Functions / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 11:58, 20 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Undominated candidate strategies under alternative voting rules |
scientific article |
Statements
Undominated candidate strategies under alternative voting rules (English)
0 references
1989
0 references
In the study of usual alternative voting rules the author formulates four different definitions of domination of candidates in ballots, provided a profile of voters' weak preferences is given: Pareto domination, just domination, plurality domination and covering domination. For all found kinds of domination the author gives their weak versions. He proves three theorems establishing relations between sets satisfying these four kinds of domination. In conclusion the author discusses the practical importance of his results for the estimation of different voting rules.
0 references
voting rules
0 references
domination of candidates
0 references
ballots
0 references
Pareto domination
0 references
just domination
0 references
plurality domination
0 references
covering domination
0 references