Undominated candidate strategies under alternative voting rules (Q583067): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Property / review text
 
In the study of usual alternative voting rules the author formulates four different definitions of domination of candidates in ballots, provided a profile of voters' weak preferences is given: Pareto domination, just domination, plurality domination and covering domination. For all found kinds of domination the author gives their weak versions. He proves three theorems establishing relations between sets satisfying these four kinds of domination. In conclusion the author discusses the practical importance of his results for the estimation of different voting rules.
Property / review text: In the study of usual alternative voting rules the author formulates four different definitions of domination of candidates in ballots, provided a profile of voters' weak preferences is given: Pareto domination, just domination, plurality domination and covering domination. For all found kinds of domination the author gives their weak versions. He proves three theorems establishing relations between sets satisfying these four kinds of domination. In conclusion the author discusses the practical importance of his results for the estimation of different voting rules. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91B14 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 4131896 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
voting rules
Property / zbMATH Keywords: voting rules / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
domination of candidates
Property / zbMATH Keywords: domination of candidates / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
ballots
Property / zbMATH Keywords: ballots / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Pareto domination
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Pareto domination / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
just domination
Property / zbMATH Keywords: just domination / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
plurality domination
Property / zbMATH Keywords: plurality domination / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
covering domination
Property / zbMATH Keywords: covering domination / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q59765458 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(89)90416-0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2097589584 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3323629 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A new definition of a Stieltjes integral / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Condorcet Social Choice Functions / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 11:58, 20 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Undominated candidate strategies under alternative voting rules
scientific article

    Statements

    Undominated candidate strategies under alternative voting rules (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    In the study of usual alternative voting rules the author formulates four different definitions of domination of candidates in ballots, provided a profile of voters' weak preferences is given: Pareto domination, just domination, plurality domination and covering domination. For all found kinds of domination the author gives their weak versions. He proves three theorems establishing relations between sets satisfying these four kinds of domination. In conclusion the author discusses the practical importance of his results for the estimation of different voting rules.
    0 references
    voting rules
    0 references
    domination of candidates
    0 references
    ballots
    0 references
    Pareto domination
    0 references
    just domination
    0 references
    plurality domination
    0 references
    covering domination
    0 references

    Identifiers