Spaces of continuous functions on ordinals and ultrafilters (Q2640183): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3213662 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Inverse problem for periodic finite-zoned potentials in the theory of scattering / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Compactness is not preserved by the t-equivalence relation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3326405 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Infinite-Dimensional Pre-Hilbert Space not Homeomorphic to its own Square / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3266617 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 14:24, 21 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Spaces of continuous functions on ordinals and ultrafilters
scientific article

    Statements

    Spaces of continuous functions on ordinals and ultrafilters (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    The author considers spaces C(X) of continuous real-valued functions, as topological vector spaces endowed with the topology of pointwise convergence, and focuses on the question of when finite Cartesian powers of such spaces are isomorphic (or merely homeomorphic). His main result answers affirmatively Problem 22 of \textit{A. V. Arkhangel'skij} [Usp. Mat. Nauk 33, No.6(204), 29-84 (1978; Zbl 0414.54002)] as to whether there exists a compact Hausdorff space X such that C(X) is not homeomorphic to its square. (The author notes that this problem was independently solved by \textit{W. Marciszewski} [Stud. Math. 88, No.2, 129-137 (1988; Zbl 0666.46022)], using different ideas.) The first result concern \(X=[\omega_ 1]\), the space of ordinals less than or equal to the first uncountable ordinal. It is this space that furnishes the author's answer to Arkhangel'skij's problem. Theorem 1. The finite Cartesian powers of \(C([\omega_ 1])\) are pairwise nonhomeomorphic. - In response to further (but unpublished) questions of Arkhangel'skij, the author next considers spaces of the form \(X=N_{\xi}\), where N is the discrete space of natural numbers, \(\xi\) is a nonprincipal ultrafilter on N, and \(N_{\xi}\) is \(N\cup \{\xi \}\), topologized as a subspace of the Čech-Stone compactification of N. Two ultrafilters on N are equivalent if there is a permutation on N whose Čech-Stone lifting takes one ultrafilter to the other. Theorem 2. \(C(N_{\xi})\) and \(C(N_{\eta})\) are isomorphic as topological vector spaces if and only if \(\xi\) and \(\eta\) are equivalent. - Theorem 3. If \(C(N_{\xi})\) is a topological direct sum of two closed infinite- dimensional vector subspaces, then one of the summands is isomorphic to \(C(N_{\xi})\), and the other is isomorphic to C(N). - By a theorem of \textit{V. V. Tkachuk} [Sov. Math., Dokl. 27, 681-684 (1983); Translation from Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 270, 795-798 (1983; Zbl 0539.54001)], \(C(N_{\xi})\) and C(N) are not isomorphic (or even homeomorphic) when \(\xi\) is nonprincipal. This fact, plus theorem 3, give the following Corollary. For any ultrafilter \(\xi\) on N, all the finite Cartesian powers of \(C(N_{\xi})\) are pairwise nonisomorphic.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    spaces of continuous functions
    0 references
    ordinal spaces
    0 references
    spaces of ultrafilters
    0 references
    topological vector spaces
    0 references