A note on implicit functions in locally convex spaces (Q1035120): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Alessandro Trombetta / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Peter P. Zabreĭko / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2122177240 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5571935 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4429207 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: \(t\)-osculating operators in a space of continuous functions and applications / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4955913 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Banach algebras of operators on locally convex spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3687213 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Approach to Fixed-Point Theorems on Uniform Spaces / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 04:11, 2 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note on implicit functions in locally convex spaces
scientific article

    Statements

    A note on implicit functions in locally convex spaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 November 2009
    0 references
    The article deals with the operator equation \[ \Phi(\lambda,x) = 0 \] with \(\Phi: \Lambda \times X \to X\), where \(X\) is a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space with a family of seminorms \(P\) over the field \(\mathbb R\) or \(\mathbb C\), and \(\Lambda\) is an open set in \(\mathbb R\) or \(\mathbb C\). The main result is the existence of a unique implicit function \(x(\lambda)\) provided that the following conditions hold: (a) \(\Phi(\lambda_0,x_0) = 0\) and \(\Phi(\cdot,x_0)\) is continuous at \(\lambda_0\); (b) there exists an operator \(L: \;\Lambda \to {\mathcal L}(X)\) such that \[ p(\Phi(\lambda,x_1) - \Phi(\lambda,x_2) - L(\lambda)(x_1 - x_2)) \leq \sigma(\rho,r)p(x_1 - x_2), \] when \(|\lambda - \lambda_0| \leq \rho\), \(x_1, x_2 \in x_0 + {\mathcal U}(r,q)\) (\({\mathcal U}(r,q) = \{x \in X: \;q(x) \leq \varepsilon\}\), \(q \in P\)) and \(\sigma(\rho,r) \to 0\) as \(\rho,r \to 0\); (c) the operators \(L(\lambda)\) are invertible and the family \(\{L(\lambda)^{-1}: \;\lambda \in \Lambda\}\) is uniformly bounded. This theorem is a modification of the main result from [the reviewer, \textit{J. S. Kolesov} and \textit{M. A. Krasnosel'skiĭ}, Sov.\ Math., Dokl.\ 10, 111--114 (1969); translation from Dokl.\ Akad.\ Nauk SSSR 184, 526--529 (1969; Zbl 0181.42001)]. In the end of the article, the Hammerstein equation \(x = \lambda KFx\) is considered as an example.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    locally convex spaces
    0 references
    implicit function theorem
    0 references
    Hammerstein equation
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references