Are the hyperharmonics integral? A partial answer via the small intervals containing primes (Q627730): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2010.12.015 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1976194947 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3077195 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4882943 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The generalization and proof of Bertrand's postulate / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Almost all short intervals containing prime numbers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the interval containing at least one prime number / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: About the Non-Integer Property of Hyperharmonic Numbers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Short effective intervals containing primes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sharper Bounds for the Chebyshev Functions θ(x) and ψ(x). II / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 19:36, 3 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Are the hyperharmonics integral? A partial answer via the small intervals containing primes
scientific article

    Statements

    Are the hyperharmonics integral? A partial answer via the small intervals containing primes (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 March 2011
    0 references
    Let \(H_n:=1+\frac 12+\ldots+\frac 1n \) be the harmonic numbers. For a positive integer \(r\) the hyperharmonic numbers of order \(r\) are defined by \[ H_n^{(1)}:=H_n,H_n^{(r)}= \sum_{k=1}^nH_k^{(r-1)}, r>1. \] The authors prove: For any \(s\in(1,2)\) there is a prime number \(P_0\) such that for any integers \(r\) and \(n\) with \(5\leq r\leq (2-s)P_0+2\) and \(n\geq P_0\) the number \(H_n^{(r)}\) is not an integer. The number \(H_n^{(r)}\) is not an integer for \(n\geq 2\) and \(5\leq r\leq 25\), for \(n\geq 2.010.881\) and \(5\leq r\leq 2.010.761\), for \(n\geq 10.726.905.041\) and \(5\leq r\leq 10.726.904.664\).
    0 references
    hyperharmonic numbers
    0 references
    integrality
    0 references

    Identifiers