Almost everywhere convergence of convolution powers without finite second moment (Q646391): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q587715
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Raymond L.Johnson / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2962807734 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1008.1329 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4945126 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Almost everywhere convergence of weighted averages / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Almost everywhere convergence of convolution powers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Iterates of Convolutions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A remark on almost everywhere convergence of convolution powers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The strong sweeping out property for convolution powers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Absolutely convergent Fourier series and function classes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4085017 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3254471 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:23, 4 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Almost everywhere convergence of convolution powers without finite second moment
scientific article

    Statements

    Almost everywhere convergence of convolution powers without finite second moment (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    17 November 2011
    0 references
    Let \(\mu(k)\), \(k \in \mathbb{Z}\), be a probability measure on \(\mathbb{Z}\). Its convolution \(\mu * \mu\) is defined by \[ \mu * \mu(k) = \sum_{j \in Z} \mu(j) \mu(k - j), \] and the \(n\)-fold convolution \(\mu^n(k)\) is defined inductively by \(\mu^n(k) = \mu * \mu^{n - 1}(k)\). The Fourier transform of \(\mu\) is denoted \(\theta(t)\), \(t \in [-1/2, 1/2)\), and is equal to \[ \theta(t) = \sum_{k \in Z} \mu(k)e^{2 \pi i t}. \] The \(p^{\text{th}}\) moment of \(\mu \) is the sum \(m_p(\mu) = \sum |k|^p \mu(k)\), and \(\mu \) has a \(p^{\text{th}}\) moment if the sum is finite. Here, \(p\) is allowed to take non-integral values, the expectation of \(\mu\) is \(E(\mu) = \sum_{k \in Z} k \mu(k)\), and \(\mu\) is called strictly aperiodic if the support of \(\mu\) is not contained in a proper coset of the integers, which is known to be equivalent to \(|\theta(t)| \neq 1\) for all \(t \neq 0\). The author considers the convergence of the sequence \(\mu^n f(x)\), where \(T:X \to X\) is an invertible measure preserving transformation of a probability space \((X, \mathcal{B}, \lambda)\) and \[ \mu^n f(x) = \sum_{k \in Z} \mu^n(k) f(T^k x),\;f \in L^1(X, \lambda). \] There is a procedure for considering this question which uses the Calderón transfer principle to reduce the question to a weak type estimate for a maximal operator, associated with the \(\mu^n\). Using these methods, \textit{A. Bellow} and \textit{A. P. Calderón} proved the almost everywhere convergence of \(\mu^nf(x)\) when \(\mu\) is strictly aperiodic, \(E(\mu) = 0\) and \(m_2(\mu) < \infty\) [``A weak-type inequality for convolution products'', in: M. Christ (ed.) et al., Harmonic analysis and partial differential equations. Proceedings of a conference, University of Chicago, IL, USA, February 1996, 41--48 (1999; Zbl 0960.28011)]. \textit{V. Losert} proved that the result cannot be extended to measures with \(m_p(\mu) < \infty\) for \(p < 2\) [Ill. J. Math. 43, No.~3, 465--479 (1999; Zbl 0963.28014); Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 21, No.~1, 115--119 (2001; Zbl 0972.37002)]. However, it was shown by \textit{A. Bellow}, \textit{R. L. Jones} and \textit{J. Rosenblatt} that, if \(\mu\) is symmetric and \(\mu(k) \geq \mu(k + 1)\) for all \(k>0\), then \(\mu^nf(x)\) converges a.e.\ for \(f \in L^1(X)\) [Math. Ann. 293, No.~3, 399--426 (1992; Zbl 0736.28008); Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 14, No.~3, 415--432 (1994; Zbl 0818.28005)]. The author gives a result which weakens the requirement that the second moment be finite in the Calderón-Bellow theorem. A~corollary of his main result is the following. Theorem. Suppose that \(\mu\) is a strictly aperiodic, symmetric measure on \(\mathbb{Z}\) and, for some \(0 < \alpha \leq 1\), \[ \sum_{|k| \leq n } k^n \mu(k) = O(n^{1 - \alpha}). \] \noindent Suppose that \(\theta^{\prime \prime}(t) \) exists in some set \(0 < |t| < \delta\) and that \(\operatorname{Re}(\theta^{\prime \prime}(t)) = p(t) + O(1) < 0\), where \(p(t)\) is non-decreasing in this set. Then \(\{ \mu^nf(x) \}\) converges a.e.\ for all \(f \in L^1(X)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    convolution powers
    0 references
    a.e convergence
    0 references
    Fourier transform
    0 references
    Lipschitz class \(Lip(\alpha)\)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references