Priestley style duality for distributive meet-semilattices (Q763299): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-011-9323-5 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2036781278 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Esakia style duality for implicative semilattices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4436398 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Choiceless, pointless, but not useless: dualities for preframes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Ideals in Partially Ordered Sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Continuous Lattices and Domains / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4399900 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5270289 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The category of semilattices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Representation of Distributive Lattices by means of ordered Stone Spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Ordered Topological Spaces and the Representation of Distributive Lattices / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 00:16, 5 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Priestley style duality for distributive meet-semilattices
scientific article

    Statements

    Priestley style duality for distributive meet-semilattices (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 March 2012
    0 references
    The authors generalize Priestley duality for distributive lattices to a duality for distributive meet-semilattices. A structure \(X= \langle X, \tau, \leq, X_0\rangle\) is called a generalized Priestley space if 1. \(\langle X, \tau, \leq \rangle\) is a Priestley space. 2. \(X_0\) is a dense subset of \(X\). 3. For each \(x\in X\) there is \(y\in X_0\) such that \(x\leq y\). 4. \(x\in X_0\) if and only if \(\mathcal{I}_x\) is up-directed. 5. For all \(x,y\in X\), \(x\leq y\) iff \((\forall U \in X^*)(x\in U \Rightarrow y\in U)\), where \(X^*\) is the set of \(X_0\)-admissible clopen up-sets of \(X\), where \(\mathcal{I}_x = \{ U \,|\, x\not\in U \;\text{and} \;U \;\text{is \;an} \;X_0 \text{-admissible \;clopen \;upset \;of } \;X\}\). Concerning the bounded distributive meet-semilattice, they prove: Theorem 5.8 (Representation Theorem). For each bounded distributive meet-semilattice \(L\), there exists a generalized Priestley space \(X\) such that \(L \cong X^*\). For generalized Priestley spaces \(X\) and \(Y\), a relation \(R\subseteq X\times Y\) is called a generalized Priestley morphism if the following two conditions are satisfied: 1. If not \(xRy\), then there is \(U\in Y^*\) such that \(y\not\in U\) and \(R[x]\subseteq U\). 2. If \(U\in Y^*\), then \(\square_R U \in X^*\), where \(\square_R U = \{ x\in X\,|\, (\forall y\in Y) (xRy \Rightarrow y\in U)\} = \{ x\in X \,|\, R[x]\subseteq U \}\). Then, for the category \textbf{GPS} of generalized Priestley spaces and generalized Priestley morphisms, they prove: Theorem 6.9. The category \textbf{BDM} is dually equivalent to the category \textbf{GPS}, where \textbf{BDM} is the category of bounded distributive meet-semilattices and meet-semilattice homomorphisms preserving top. The result above is extend to non-bounded cases. A structure \(X= \langle X, \tau, \leq, X_0 \rangle\) is called a \(*\)-generalized Priestley space if 1. \(\langle X, \tau, \leq \rangle\) is a Priestley space. 2. \(X_0\) is a dense subset of \(X\). 3. \(x\in X_0\) iff \(\mathcal{I}_x\) is non-empty and up-directed. 4. For all \(x,y\in X\), \(x\leq y\) iff \((\forall U \in X^*)(x\in U \Rightarrow y\in U)\). For the category \textbf{GPS\(^*\)} of \(*\)-generalized Priestley spaces and generalized Priestley morphisms, they prove the following result: Theorem 9.2. The category \textbf{DM} is dually equivalent to the category \textbf{GPS\(^*\)}, where \textbf{DM} is the category of distributive meet-semilattices and meet-semilattice homomorphisms.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    distributive meet-semilattices
    0 references
    distributive lattices
    0 references
    duality theory
    0 references
    0 references