Commuting maps on some subsets of matrices that are not closed under addition (Q417604): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.02.018 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2032217258 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Centralizing mappings and derivations in prime rings / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Commuting maps: a survey. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3417002 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Linear Preserver Problems / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 05:37, 5 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Commuting maps on some subsets of matrices that are not closed under addition |
scientific article |
Statements
Commuting maps on some subsets of matrices that are not closed under addition (English)
0 references
14 May 2012
0 references
Let \(M_{n}(\mathbb K)\) be the ring of all \(n\times n\) matrices over a field \(\mathbb K\). The author describes all additive mappings \(G:M_{n}(\mathbb K)\to M_{n}(\mathbb K)\) satisfying the condition \(G(x)x=xG(x)\) for all \(x\) from one of the following subsets of \(M_{n}(\mathbb K)\): (i) the set of all singular \(x\in M_{n}(\mathbb K)\), and (ii) the set of all invertible \(x\in M_{n}(\mathbb K)\); in the second case the extra assumption \(|\mathbb K|>2\) is made. In both cases such a \(G\) has the form \(x\mapsto\lambda x + \mu(x)\), where \(\lambda\) is a scalar multiple of the identity matrix and \(\mu\) is an additive mapping of \(M_{n}(\mathbb K)\) into its centre. An illustrative example shows that in (ii) the assumption on \(|\mathbb K|\) must not be dropped.
0 references
commuting maps
0 references
invertible matrices
0 references
singular matrices
0 references
linear preserver problems
0 references
matrix rings
0 references