Powerful numbers in \((1^k +1)(2^k+1) \cdots (n^k +1)\) (Q452395): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Wen Peng Zhang / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Ting-Ting Wang / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2012.05.025 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2312861637 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Arithmetical properties of a sequence arising from an arctangent sum / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Squares in \((1^2+1)\dots(n^2+1)\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The 𝑘^{𝑡ℎ} prime is greater than 𝑘(ln𝑘+lnln𝑘-1) for 𝑘≥2 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Powerful Numbers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A note on the products \((1^\mu +1)(2^\mu +1)\dots (n^\mu +1)\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The large sieve / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:42, 5 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Powerful numbers in \((1^k +1)(2^k+1) \cdots (n^k +1)\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Powerful numbers in \((1^k +1)(2^k+1) \cdots (n^k +1)\) (English)
    0 references
    21 September 2012
    0 references
    Define \(\Omega_k(n)=\prod_{a=1}^n (a^k+1)\). The authors show that if \(k\) is an odd prime, then \(\Omega_k(n)\) is not powerful. For the proof they show by elementary means that if \(p\in[n/2+1, n+1]\) is a prime, satisfying \(p\neq k\) and \(p\not\equiv 1\pmod{k}\), then \(p\mid\Omega_k(n)\), but \(p^2\nmid\Omega_k(n)\). In particular, if such a prime exists, then \(\Omega_k(n)\) is not powerful. They then combine an explicit version of the prime number theorem with the Brun-Titchmarsh inequality to show that for \(n>9\) such a prime always exists.
    0 references
    0 references
    powerful number
    0 references
    explicit prime number theorem
    0 references
    shifted power
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references