On trilinear oscillatory integrals (Q742889): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: ON AN EXTREMAL PROBLEM FOR POLYNOMIALS IN<i>n</i>VARIABLES / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Multidimensional van der Corput and sublevel set estimates / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On multilinear oscillatory integrals, nonsingular and singular / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Simply nondegenerate multilinear oscillatory integral operators with smooth phase / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Multilinear level set operators, oscillatory integral operators, and Newton polyhedra / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3142876 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 02:21, 9 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On trilinear oscillatory integrals
scientific article

    Statements

    On trilinear oscillatory integrals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    19 September 2014
    0 references
    The investigation of multilinear oscillatory integrals with modulation invariances was initiated in the seminal paper [\textit{M. Christ} et al., Duke Math. J. 130, No. 2, 321--351 (2005; Zbl 1119.42005)]. The paper under review studies trilinear oscillatory integrals \[ I(P;f_1,f_2,f_3) := \int_{\mathbb{R}^{2\kappa}} e^{iP(x,y)} f_1(x) f_2(y) f_3(x+y) \eta(x,y) dx dy, \] where \(P\) is a polynomial of degree at most \(d\), while \(\eta\) is a smooth compactly supported function, and establishes decay estimates of the form \[ |I(P;f_1,f_2,f_3)| \leq C (1+\|P\|_{nd})^{-\epsilon} \prod_{j=1}^{3}\|f_j\|_{\mathrm{L}^{2}(\mathbb{R}^\kappa)}. \] Here \(\|\cdot\|_{nd}\) denotes some norm on the quotient space of the polynomials of degree at most \(d\) by degenerate polynomials (i.e. sums of the polynomials in \(x\), \(y\), or \(x+y\) alone), while the constants \(\epsilon\) and \(C\) are allowed to depend on \(\kappa\), \(d\), and \(\eta\). This result is new when \(\kappa\geq 2\), as the techniques developed prior to this paper were applicable only when either the functions are one-dimensional or they are defined on subspaces of small codimension. Also, the general case when the three functions \(f_1,f_2,f_3\) are composed with three surjective maps from \(\mathbb{R}^{2\kappa}\) to \(\mathbb{R}^\kappa\) with mutually transverse nullspaces can be reduced to the case stated above. The authors invent a reduction argument that decomposes the functions into appropriate ``structured'' and ``pseudorandom'' parts.
    0 references
    0 references
    trilinear oscillatory integrals
    0 references
    stationary phase
    0 references
    sublevel set estimates
    0 references
    0 references