Kinematics comparative study of two overconstrained parallel manipulators (Q1793250): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q59131481, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1706300061798
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5091405 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2540135417 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Study of Reactional Force Compensation Based on Three‐Degree‐of Freedom Parallel Platforms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Analysis of instantaneous motions of deficient-rank 3-RPS parallel manipulators / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Identification of dynamic parameters of a 3-DOF RPS parallel manipulator / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 21:35, 16 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Kinematics comparative study of two overconstrained parallel manipulators
scientific article

    Statements

    Kinematics comparative study of two overconstrained parallel manipulators (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    12 October 2018
    0 references
    Summary: A comparison study of kinematics characteristics of two overconstrained 2-RPU\&SPR parallel manipulators (PMs) is introduced in this paper. The two 2-RPU\&SPR PMs have the same kinematics properties in terms of one translational degree of freedom (DOF) and two rotational DOFs kinematics outputs. But there are some differences between the two PMs as far as joints distribution is concerned, leading to the differences in respect of workspace and dexterity of the two PMs. Firstly, based on screw theory, the structural characteristics and DOFs of the two PMs are analyzed. Secondly, the inverse and forward displacements problems for the two PMs are formulated by analytic formulae. Some numerical examples are simulated by software. Thirdly, based on algorithm for the direct displacement solution, the workspace characteristics of the two PMs are analyzed and compared. Then, the Jacobian matrices of the mechanisms are formulated. Based on the Jacobian matrices, the dexterities of the two PMs are established and compared. Finally, according to the comparisons of the properties between the two PMs, some useful conclusions are provided.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references