Kinematics comparative study of two overconstrained parallel manipulators (Q1793250): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Property / full work available at URL | |||
| Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5091405 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID: W2540135417 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: A Study of Reactional Force Compensation Based on Three‐Degree‐of Freedom Parallel Platforms / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: Analysis of instantaneous motions of deficient-rank 3-RPS parallel manipulators / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: Identification of dynamic parameters of a 3-DOF RPS parallel manipulator / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Latest revision as of 20:35, 16 July 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Kinematics comparative study of two overconstrained parallel manipulators |
scientific article |
Statements
Kinematics comparative study of two overconstrained parallel manipulators (English)
0 references
12 October 2018
0 references
Summary: A comparison study of kinematics characteristics of two overconstrained 2-RPU\&SPR parallel manipulators (PMs) is introduced in this paper. The two 2-RPU\&SPR PMs have the same kinematics properties in terms of one translational degree of freedom (DOF) and two rotational DOFs kinematics outputs. But there are some differences between the two PMs as far as joints distribution is concerned, leading to the differences in respect of workspace and dexterity of the two PMs. Firstly, based on screw theory, the structural characteristics and DOFs of the two PMs are analyzed. Secondly, the inverse and forward displacements problems for the two PMs are formulated by analytic formulae. Some numerical examples are simulated by software. Thirdly, based on algorithm for the direct displacement solution, the workspace characteristics of the two PMs are analyzed and compared. Then, the Jacobian matrices of the mechanisms are formulated. Based on the Jacobian matrices, the dexterities of the two PMs are established and compared. Finally, according to the comparisons of the properties between the two PMs, some useful conclusions are provided.
0 references
