Equivalent game forms and coalitional power (Q804482): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(90)90004-q / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1975250831 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:07, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Equivalent game forms and coalitional power |
scientific article |
Statements
Equivalent game forms and coalitional power (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
A game form is a strategic game from which the payoffs are suppressed. It consists of a finite player set N, a finite strategy space \(S_ i\) for each player i and a map g which assigns to every n-tuple of strategies a point of an outcome space Z (or a probability measure on Z if the game form contains a non-trivial `chance player'). Introducing for each player a utility function on the outcome space Z makes the game form to a strategic game. If we identify equivalent strategies (i.e. strategies which give the same utility for every strategy (n-1)-tuple of the opponents) and delete redundant strategies (strategies which have the same payoff as a convex combination of other strategies) we find a reduced strategic game. Two game forms are called equivalent if introduction of utilities generates the `same' reduced games. Also game forms can be reduced by identifying equivalent strategies and skipping redundant strategies. Game forms are called identical if the strategy sets can be identified under a bijective map and linear dependencies between the outcome probabilities of a set of strategy n-tuples in the first game form are transformed into linear dependencies between the outcome probabilities in the second game form and vice versa. In section 2 of this paper it is proved that game forms are equivalent if and only if the reduced game forms are identical. In section 3 \(\alpha\)- and \(\beta\)-effectivity functions are associated with reduced game forms and `identity' of effectivity functions is defined. If two game forms have identical \(\alpha\)- and \(\beta\)-effectivity functions the game forms need not be equivalent but if the \(\alpha\)-effecivity function is moreover agent-additive (i.e. if \(A_ i\) is effective for \(\{\) \(i\}\), (i\(\in N)\) then \(\cap_{i\in N}A_ i\) is effective for N) then the two game forms are equivalent. Further it is proved that agent-additivity follows from superadditivity or convexity of the \(\alpha\)-effectivity function or the property of the extensive game form to have unique outcomes at all points of the game tree.
0 references
game form
0 references
outcome space
0 references
reduced strategic game
0 references
effectivity functions
0 references
agent-additivity
0 references
superadditivity
0 references
convexity
0 references