Slightly trivial extensions of a fusion category (Q2285059): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q127298569, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1722468928777 |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On braided fusion categories. I / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On fusion categories. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Crossed product tensor categories / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Exact factorizations and extensions of fusion categories / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Solvability of a class of braided fusion categories / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4808275 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On classification of modular tensor categories / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q127298569 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 00:46, 1 August 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Slightly trivial extensions of a fusion category |
scientific article |
Statements
Slightly trivial extensions of a fusion category (English)
0 references
16 January 2020
0 references
To explain the result of this paper, we need some definitions at first. A fusion category \(\mathcal{C}\) is called \(G\)-graded if there is a decomposition \(\mathcal{C} = \bigoplus_{g\in G}\mathcal{C}_g\) of full abelian subcategories such that \(\mathcal{C}^{\ast}=\mathcal{C}_{g^{-1}}\) and \(\mathcal{C}_{g}\mathcal{C}_h\subseteq\mathcal{C}_{gh}\) for \(G\) a group and \(g,h\in G\). A \(G\)-grading \(\mathcal{C} = \bigoplus_{g\in G}\mathcal{C}_g\) is called faithful if \(\mathcal{C}_{g}\neq 0\) for all \(g\in G\) and is called a \(G\)-extension of another fusion category \(\mathcal{D}\) if this grading is faithful and \(\mathcal{C}_{e}\) is equivalent to \(\mathcal{D}\) as tensor categories. Now let \(\mathcal{C} = \bigoplus_{g\in G}\mathcal{C}_g\) be an extension of \(\mathcal{D}\) and denote the class of irreducible objects (up to isomorphisms) of \(\mathcal{D}\) by \(\mathrm{Irr}(\mathcal{D})=\{X_1,\ldots,X_n\}\). We say that the component \(\mathcal{C}_{g}\) is similar to \(\mathcal{D}\) if there exists an invertible simple object \(\delta_{g}\in \mathcal{C}_g\) such that \(\mathrm{Irr}(\mathcal{C}_{g})=\{\delta_{g}\otimes X_1,\ldots,\delta_{g}\otimes X_n\}\). If all components are similar to \(\mathcal{D}\), then \(\mathcal{C}\) is called a slightly trivial extension of \(\mathcal{D}\) as the title said. The paper under reviewed gave a necessary and sufficient condition for \(\mathcal{C}\) to be a slightly trivial extension of \(\mathcal{D}\) which is every component contains an invertible simple object. The author also provided two examples of slightly trivial extension.
0 references
fusion category
0 references
extension
0 references
Ising category
0 references