Evolutionary inspection and corruption games (Q725050): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.3390/g7040031 / rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.3390/G7040031 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 02:08, 10 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Evolutionary inspection and corruption games |
scientific article |
Statements
Evolutionary inspection and corruption games (English)
0 references
1 August 2018
0 references
Summary: We extend a standard two-person, noncooperative, non-zero sum, imperfect inspection game, considering a large population of interacting inspectees and a single inspector. Each inspectee adopts one strategy, within a finite/infinite bounded set of strategies returning increasingly illegal profits, including compliance. The inspectees may periodically update their strategies after randomly inter-comparing the obtained payoffs, setting their collective behaviour subject to evolutionary pressure. The inspector decides, at each update period, the optimum fraction of his/her renewable budget to invest on his/her interference with the inspectees' collective effect. To deter the inspectees from violating, he/she assigns a fine to each illegal strategy. We formulate the game mathematically, study its dynamics and predict its evolution subject to two key controls, the inspection budget and the punishment fine. Introducing a simple linguistic twist, we also capture the corresponding version of a corruption game.
0 references
inspection game
0 references
corruption game
0 references
evolutionary game
0 references
noncooperative game
0 references
dynamic game
0 references
multiple inspectees
0 references
multiple violation levels
0 references
inspection budget
0 references
punishment fine
0 references