From (secure) \(w\)-domination in graphs to protection of lexicographic product graphs (Q2239006): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s40840-021-01141-8 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 2105.05199 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5503336 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On secure domination in graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Vertex Covers and Secure Domination in Graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Constructive characterizations concerning weak Roman domination in trees / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Double domination in lexicographic product graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounds on weak Roman and 2-rainbow domination numbers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4812925 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5461685 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Secure Italian domination in graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Secure total domination in graphs: bounds and complexity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4368728 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Defending the Roman Empire---a new strategy / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Protection of lexicographic product graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Secure domination and secure total domination in graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Protection of graphs with emphasis on Cartesian product graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the weak Roman domination number of lexicographic product graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S40840-021-01141-8 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:22, 17 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
From (secure) \(w\)-domination in graphs to protection of lexicographic product graphs
scientific article

    Statements

    From (secure) \(w\)-domination in graphs to protection of lexicographic product graphs (English)
    0 references
    2 November 2021
    0 references
    Let \(w = (w_0,w_1,\ldots ,w_\ell)\) be a vector of nonnegative integers with \(w_0\ge 1\). A function \(f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,\ldots , \ell\}\) is a \(w\)-dominating function of a graph \(G\) if \(f(N(v)) \ge w_i\) holds for for every vertex \(v\) with \(f(v)=i\). The \(w\)-domination number \(\gamma_w(G)\) of \(G\) is the minimum weight among all \(w\)-dominating functions. This concepts widely generalizes many standard domination concepts. For instance, the domination number is \(\gamma_{(1,0)}\), the total domination number is \(\gamma_{(1,1)}\), the Italian domination number is \(\gamma_{(2,0,0)}\), and the total Italian domination number is \(\gamma_{(2,1,1)}\). Similarly one defines the secure \(w\)-domination number \(\gamma_w^s(G)\) of \(G\) such that \(\gamma_{(1,0)}^s\) is the secure domination number. In this paper, results on domination invariants of lexicographic products \(G\circ H\) are expressed with \(w\)-domination invariants of \(G\). For instance, if \(\gamma_{(1,0)}^s(H)\ge 4\) and \(\gamma(H)\ge 3\), then \(\gamma_{(1,0)}^s(G\circ H) = \gamma_{(2,2,2)}(G)\). Exact results for \(\gamma_{(1,0)}^s(G\circ H)\) are then deduced when \(G\) is a complete (bipartite) graph, path, or a cycle. It is further proved that if \(H\) is a noncomplete graph with a dominating vertex, then \(\gamma_{(1,0,0)}^s(G\circ H) = \gamma_{(2,1,0)}(G)\). Similar results are also proved for the secure total domination and total weak Roman domination. For instance, if \(\gamma_{(1,1)}^s(H) = 2\), then \(\gamma_{(1,1)}^s(G\circ H) = \gamma_{(1,1,0)}^s(G)\), and if \(\gamma(H)\ge 3\), then \(\gamma_{(1,1)}^s(G\circ H) = \gamma_{(2,2,2)}(G)\).
    0 references
    secure \(w\)-domination
    0 references
    \(w\)-domination
    0 references
    weak Roman domination
    0 references
    secure domination
    0 references
    lexicographic product
    0 references

    Identifiers