What is the upper part of the lattice of bimodal logics? (Q1327483): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Valentin Shehtman / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Valentin Shehtman / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the lattice of extensions of the modal logics \(KAlt_ n\) / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The lattice of modal logics: an algebraic investigation / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: That All Normal Extensions of S4.3 Have the Finite Model Property / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Properties of independently axiomatizable bimodal logics / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Modal logics with functional alternative relations / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 15:34, 22 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | What is the upper part of the lattice of bimodal logics? |
scientific article |
Statements
What is the upper part of the lattice of bimodal logics? (English)
0 references
13 June 1995
0 references
The paper proves a rather surprising fact for the lattice of normal bimodal logics. Namely, let \(\Lambda_ 1\) be the monomodal logic of a two-element chain, and consider the ``fusion'' \(\Lambda_ 1 \otimes \text{S5}\), which is defined as the extension of the minimal normal bimodal logic by axioms of \(\Lambda_ 1\) for \(\square_ 1\) and axioms of S5 for \(\square_ 2\). For a modal logic \(L\), \({\mathcal E} (L)\) denotes the lattice of normal extensions of \(L\) (in the same language). The main theorem states that \({\mathcal E} (T)\) (\(T\) is the logic of all reflexive Kripke frames) can be embedded into \({\mathcal E} (\Lambda_ 1 \otimes \text{S5}\)). Thus the latter is uncountable, although \({\mathcal E} (\Lambda_ 1)\) is finite and \({\mathcal E} (S5)\) is a \((1+ \omega^*)\)-chain.
0 references
fusion
0 references
lattice of normal bimodal logics
0 references
lattice of normal extensions
0 references
Kripke frames
0 references