How to prove impossibility under global fairness: on space complexity of self-stabilizing leader election on a population protocol model (Q692907): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-011-9313-z / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2092232879 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Computation in networks of passively mobile finite-state sensors / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Stably computable predicates are semilinear / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Simple Population Protocol for Fast Robust Approximate Majority / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The computational power of population protocols / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3396623 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Self-stabilizing Counting in Mobile Sensor Networks with a Base Station / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 23:50, 5 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
How to prove impossibility under global fairness: on space complexity of self-stabilizing leader election on a population protocol model
scientific article

    Statements

    How to prove impossibility under global fairness: on space complexity of self-stabilizing leader election on a population protocol model (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    6 December 2012
    0 references
    Population protocols is one of the distributed computing models where a number of mobile agents change their states by pairwise interactions. A self-stabilizing protocol ensures that the system converges to the desired behavior regardless its initial configuration. A leader election allows to distinguish a single agent with the final state ELECTED, the state of the other agents is NON-ELECTED. Global fairness guarantees the occurrence of any possible transition. This paper proves that under the assumption of global fairness, no protocol using only \(n-1\) states (where \(n\) is the number of agents) can solve the self-stabilizing leader election in complete interaction graphs.
    0 references
    distributed algorithm
    0 references
    leader election
    0 references
    population protocol
    0 references
    self-stabilization
    0 references
    global fairness
    0 references

    Identifiers