Monotonicity of bargaining solutions with respect to the disagreement point (Q1088922): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(87)90102-5 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2082987645 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The bargaining problem: axioms concerning changes in the conflict point / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Egalitarianism and Utilitarianism in Quasi-Linear Bargaining / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Bargaining Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5545175 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3843226 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Monotonicity and independence axioms / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:43, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Monotonicity of bargaining solutions with respect to the disagreement point
scientific article

    Statements

    Monotonicity of bargaining solutions with respect to the disagreement point (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    We investigate whether the best known solutions to the bargaining problem respond appropriately to certain changes in the disagreement point d, for a fixed feasible set. If \(d_ i\) increases, while for each \(j\neq i\), \(d_ j\) remains constant, then these solutions recommend an increase in agent i's payoff, in agreement with intuition. However, the stronger requirement that agent i be the only one to gain is not generally met.
    0 references
    bargaining problem
    0 references
    disagreement point
    0 references

    Identifiers