Bargaining in a non-stationary environment. (Q1810696): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Wage Bargaining, Inventories, and Union Legislation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A dynamic equilibrium model of search, bargaining, and money / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Stochastic Model of Sequential Bargaining with Complete Information / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Job Creation and Job Destruction in the Theory of Unemployment / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4255117 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Bargaining Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4004282 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0531(02)00034-0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2155931054 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:57, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bargaining in a non-stationary environment.
scientific article

    Statements

    Bargaining in a non-stationary environment. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 June 2003
    0 references
    The paper studies Rubinstein's alternating offers bargaining game in the following non-stationary setting. Two players \(A\) and \(B\) alternatively bargain at times \(t=s, s+\Delta, s+2\Delta,\ldots\) (\(s\) and \(\Delta>0\) are fixed), and \(\Omega (t) \subset \mathbb R^2\) is the set of possible utility pairs of their payoffs available at time \(t\). The players negotiate according to the following procedure. At times \(s+2n\Delta\) (\(n=0,1,\ldots\)) player \(A\) makes an offer \((u_A,u_B)\) from the set \(\Omega(s+2n\Delta)\), and player \(B\) decides whether to accept or reject it. If he accepts the offer, then the bargaining game ends and players' payoffs are \((u_A,u_B)\), respectively. Analogous situation occurs to player \(B\) at times \(s+(2n+1)\Delta\) (\(n=0,1,\ldots\)). When both players reject their offers at all times, their payoffs are equal to zero. Three standard assumptions are assumed about the Pareto frontiers of the sets \(\Omega (t)\): concavity, shrinking and vanishing, and smoothly evolving. Using this the authors characterize the set equilibria in the limit as \(\Delta \rightarrow 0\). It is shown that then any Markov and non-Markov subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) converges to the same unique limiting one. This result is illustrated by an interesting example about players' bargaining over a unit size cake. The second essential result in the paper gives sufficient conditions under which Nash's bargaining solution for the game at initial time \(s\) with the disagreement point \((0,0)\), coincides with the unique limiting SPE payoff pair. In the last part of the paper the authors extend the previous results for time-varying inside options and demonstrate the robustness of this approach.
    0 references
    bargaining solution
    0 references
    alternating offers
    0 references
    subgame perfect equilibrium
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references