Ideals whose Hilbert function and Hilbert polynomial agree at \(n=1\) (Q2367192): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1993.1114 / rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jabr.1993.1114 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2069765460 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1006/JABR.1993.1114 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 05:41, 18 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Ideals whose Hilbert function and Hilbert polynomial agree at \(n=1\) |
scientific article |
Statements
Ideals whose Hilbert function and Hilbert polynomial agree at \(n=1\) (English)
0 references
17 August 1993
0 references
Throughout let \((R,m)\) be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring of dimension \(d\geq 2\) and \(I\) an \(m\)-primary ideal. We denote by \(H_ I(n)\) (resp. \(P_ I(n))\) the Hilbert function (resp. polynomial) of \(I\), and let \(e_ 0,\ldots,e_ d\) be its Hilbert coefficients, that is, \(P_ I(x)=e_ 0{x+d-1\choose d}-e_ 1{x+d-2\choose d-1}+\cdots+(-1)^ de_ d\). It is known that (1) \(H_ I(1)=e_ 0\) if and only if \(I\) is generated by a system of parameters; (2) If \(H_ I(1)=e_ 0-e_ 1\), then \(e_ i=0\) for \(i\geq 2\) and depth gr\(_ I(R)=d\) [\textit{C. Huneke}, Mich. Math. J. 34, 293-318 (1987; Zbl 0628.13012) and \textit{A. Ooishi}, Hiroshima Math. J. 17, 361-372 (1987; Zbl 0639.13016)]; (3) If \(H_ I(1)=e_ 0-e_ 1+1\) and \(e_ 2\neq 0\), then \(e_ 2=1\), \(e_ i=0\) for \(i\geq 3\) and depth gr\(_ I(R)\geq d-1\) [the author, J. Algebr. Geom. 1, No. 2, 325-333 (1992; Zbl 0779.13005)]. And in all these cases \(H_ I(n)=P_ I(n)\) for \(n\geq 1\) [cf. \textit{T. Marley}, J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 40, No. 1, 1-8 (1989; Zbl 0688.13009)]. In the paper under review the author shows that if \(H_ I(1)=e_ 0-e_ 1+e_ 2\) and \(e_ 2=2\) then \(e_ i=0\) for \(i\geq 3\), \(H_ I(n)=P_ I(n)\) for \(n\geq 1\) and depth gr\(_ I(R)\geq d-1\). The author also gives examples such that (1) \(H_ I(1)=P_ I(1)=e_ 0-e_ 1+e_ 2\) but depth gr\(_ I(R)=0\), and (2) \(H_ I(1)=e_ 0-e_ 1+2\) but \(e_ 2=3\). For the proof the author considers the ideal \(\tilde I=\bigcup_{k\geq 1}\bigl(I^{k+1}:I^ k\bigr)\) and investigates the second local cohomology module of the Rees ring of \(I\).
0 references
Cohen-Macaulay local ring
0 references
Hilbert function
0 references
Hilbert coefficients
0 references
local cohomology module of the Rees ring
0 references